210k views
1 vote
The five mnost common pre-attack indicators of active shooters are as follows:

A. Grievances, adult criminal convictions, illicit substance use, physical aggression, and financial strain.
B. Grievances, mental health struggles, psychotic disorder or mood disorder, leakage of intent, and reduced quality of thinking or communication.
C. Grievances, leakage of intent, marital problems, financial strain, and anger.
D. Grievances, mental health struggles, increased confict, leakage of intent, and reduced quality of thinking or communication.

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The correct option identifying the five most common pre-attack indicators of active shooters seems to be Option B. These include personal grievances, mental health struggles, psychotic or mood disorders, leaking of intent, and reduced thinking or communication quality, all of which align with contemporary research and incidents of violence.

Step-by-step explanation:

Understanding the five most common pre-attack indicators of active shooters is crucial for preventing potential tragedies. The indicators often include a combination of personal grievances, mental health issues, and behavioral changes. One option that aligns with recent research and incidents is Option B: Grievances, mental health struggles, psychotic disorder or mood disorder, leaking of intent, and reduced quality of thinking or communication. These indicators can be seen in the context of past events where shooters exhibited signs of distress or explicit warnings before the act of violence. Moreover, in workplace violence literature, there is emphasis on the importance of considering specific stressors and behaviors, such as a history of aggression and substance use, in making predictions about violent actions.

For instance, in the case of school shootings, the shooters often had severe mental health problems, which sometimes included harboring grievances or feeling mistreated. These emotional and psychological issues, along with behavior like leakage of intent—where individuals may communicate their violent plans before acting—can provide critical warning signs. Furthermore, a decline in the quality of thinking or communication may indicate a person in distress and who is potentially dangerous. It appears that such incidents of gun violence could be partly understood by examining personal issues along with broader societal issues like the accessibility of firearms.

User Jerielle
by
8.2k points