Final answer:
The evaluation of a logical argument is best supported by unbiased information, which includes verified facts and logical reasoning that are free from bias, emotional influence, and subjective anecdotes.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the evaluation of a logical argument, supporting evidence should be free from emotional influence, personal anecdotes, and generalizations. The most compelling support comes from unbiased information—facts that can be verified and are supported by logical reasoning and empirical evidence.
During the assessment, one should consider the logic of the argument—how the premises lead to the conclusion—and also the truth of the premises. If an argument is logically sound but based on false premises, the conclusion may be incorrect. Conversely, true premises could be drawn together in an illogical way that does not support the conclusion. In both cases, the argument would not be considered strong. Critical evaluation includes looking for any signs of bias, checking the evidence used for supporting the information, and ensuring that logical reasoning like cause and effect, comparison and contrast, or problem and solution is soundly applied.