Question

5, Using the passage as a guide, it can be inferred that the author would find euthanasia less objectionable in cases in which the

I. patient's death is imminent
II. patient has left instructions in a living will not to provide care
III. patient refuses to accept nourishment

Answer 1

The author would likely view euthanasia as less objectionable when the patient faces imminent death, has left a living will, or refuses nourishment, as both legal and ethical perspectives emphasize the importance of voluntary consent and the aim to reduce suffering.

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the provided passages, the author would likely find euthanasia less objectionable in cases where the patient's death is imminent, the patient has left clear instructions in a living will, and where the patient refuses to accept nourishment. Verbatim from the text, voluntary passive euthanasia and advanced directives like DNR orders are legal in the United States, and these involve the patient's consent to withhold life-sustaining treatments. Moreover, philosophers such as Peter Singer and James Rachels provide ethical perspectives supporting euthanasia in certain circumstances - emphasizing voluntary choice, the ability to avoid unnecessary pain, and the promotion of immediate cessation of suffering. Rachels, in particular, argues that passive euthanasia, which involves withholding treatment, can lead to prolonged suffering compared to active euthanasia, which provides a quicker end to patient suffering.