Final answer:
The motion to reconsider is typically out of order in the Senate when another member has the floor, unless the member yields the floor. In the Senate, debate is unlimited and ends when no one seeks to be recognized, which suggests a less flexible window for the motion to reconsider.
Step-by-step explanation:
The motion to reconsider is used in parliamentary procedure to propose a reexamination of a decision made by a deliberative assembly. In the context of the Senate Action, this would refer to decisions made in the United States Senate. According to standard parliamentary rules, a motion to reconsider must be made by someone who voted on the prevailing side of the original motion. It is typically in order when no other motion is pending and can be made when another member has the floor, but only if that member yields the floor for the purpose of the motion.
However, in the Senate, there is unlimited debate and amendments do not have to be germane, suggesting a more flexible approach to procedure. In this particular case, the discussion ends when no one seeks to be recognized, which indicates that a motion to reconsider might be out of order if another member has the floor and is not yielding. Therefore, the content loaded within the question implies that in a formal setting like the Senate, reconsidering a motion while another member has the floor would typically be out of order unless proper consent is given for such action.