Question

Marshall argued that if the goal of the legislation is legit and constitutional meaning everything adapted, everything consistent with the letter adn spirit of the Con are

Answer 1

In the case of Marshall v. Madison, Marshall argued that if a legislative act is inconsistent with the Constitution, it is considered void. This established the principle of judicial review.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the case of Marshall v. Madison, Marshall argued that if a legislative act is inconsistent with the Constitution, it is considered void.

This means that the Constitution, as the highest law of the land, takes precedence over any act of the legislature that goes against its provisions.

Marshall's argument established the principle of judicial review, giving the Supreme Court the power to strike down laws that are unconstitutional.