Final answer:
The June 2019 Law Bulletin implies that there may be legal restrictions on carrying stun guns and tasers in public, with varying regulations depending on local and federal laws such as Heller v. DC which shapes the right to bear arms.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to the June 2019 Law Bulletin, persons carrying stun guns and tasers in public may be subject to specific legal provisions and restrictions. While individual states can regulate the open carry and display of firearms, certain local codes and Supreme Court decisions like District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) have shaped the legal landscape regarding the possession and carrying of weapons including stun guns and tasers.
In District of Columbia v. Heller, regulations prohibited registration of handguns and mandated that lawfully registered firearms be kept unloaded and either disassembled or locked, except when located at a place of business or being used for legal activities. This landmark decision acknowledged the right to keep and bear arms for individuals. Moreover, laws such as Terry v. Ohio (1968) allow police to stop and frisk individuals if there is reasonable suspicion of a crime and the person is believed to be armed and dangerous. This context suggests that carrying stun guns and tasers in public may be heavily regulated and potentially subject to licensing, much as with handguns.