Final answer:
Officers are justified in using a conducted electrical weapon (CEW) in situations where non-lethal force is necessary and lawful, aligned with the experience-based empathy training military police receive and legal standards set by cases like Terry v. Ohio.
Step-by-step explanation:
Officers may use a conducted electrical weapon (CEW) under the same circumstances in which the use of non-lethal force would be justified.
Military police and security personnel undergo rigorous training, including being exposed to pepper spray, to ensure they understand its effects and can exercise empathy and restraint in its use. The principle behind this training is that experiencing such a deterrent firsthand enhances decision-making regarding the reasonable use of force in situations where de-escalation is preferred but control is necessary.
According to the legal precedent set by Terry v. Ohio, police can stop and frisk a person if there is a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and that the person may be armed and dangerous. This principle extends to the use of conducted electrical weapons as a method of subduing a suspect while minimizing harm. This is consistent with modern law enforcement practices, including the use of metal detectors to prevent the necessity of using force by proactively locating weapons or explosives.