Final answer:
The plural executive system limits the governor's power by having other major state officials elected independently, which reduces the governor's influence and encourages checks and balances. Additionally, term limits and separation of powers further prevent the concentration of executive power.
Step-by-step explanation:
The plural executive structure can limit the governor's power in various ways. In this system, other state officials such as the lieutenant governor, attorney general, and secretary of state are elected independently of the governor. This means that the governor does not have direct control over these officials, diminishing their ability to exert influence. Moreover, the plural executive often includes officials with competing political agendas, which can lead to less cooperation and more checks on the governor's power.
Additionally, limiting the number of consecutive terms a governor can serve reduces the chances of accumulating excessive power over time, therefore preventing an elected monarchy. Furthermore, states restrict the governor's power of patronage and support the separation of powers among the legislative, judicial, and executive branches, thus ensuring that no single branch, including the executive, becomes too powerful.
Historically, constitutions have also limited formal powers such as vetoing legislation, preparing state budgets, and appointing officials, thereby ensuring that governors cannot overstep their bounds and infringe upon the legislature's role.