Question

Probably the most common form of judicial restraint is the self-restraint of the judges themselves, who follow well-established professional norms of objectivity.

A. True
B. False

Answer 1

The statement is True; judicial restraint involves judges self-limiting their own power and adhering to established norms of objectivity, which includes respecting precedent and deferring policy decisions to other branches of government.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question posed is whether the statement that the most common form of judicial restraint is the self-restraint of judges themselves, who follow well-established professional norms of objectivity, is True or False. Judicial restraint is a legal philosophy where judges limit the exercise of their own power, especially in striking down laws, unless they are evidently unconstitutional. Judges who practice judicial restraint adhere to the legal principle of stare decisis, meaning they respect precedents set by prior rulings. They also tend to avoid making policy decisions, leaving that role to the legislative and executive branches.

Given the explanation that judicial restraint involves judges self-imposing limits on their power in deference to laws and precedents, and that this is a well-recognized professional norm in the judiciary, the statement can be seen as True.