Final answer:
Legal realism is a model of judicial decision-making that does not require rigid adherence to the letter of the law and emphasizes the consideration of social factors.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement, "Legal realism is a model of judicial decision-making that requires rigid adherence to the letter of the law," is false. Legal realism is a school of thought in legal theory that emphasizes the importance of considering social, economic, and political contexts when interpreting and applying the law. It suggests that judicial decision-making is influenced by personal and subjective factors rather than strict adherence to the letter of the law. Legal realists argue that judges should take into account the consequences of their decisions and consider the impact on society.