Final answer:
It is true that licensees should include all essential elements and get parties' signatures when creating a special contract form. The necessary and proper clause does not limit the U.S. government's power, and the fair treatment of Loyalists following the Treaty of Paris is false. John Locke did draft Carolina's original constitution, which was not practical for the colony.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question revolves around the formation of special contract forms by licensees. The statement 'Licensees should take care when creating a special contract form and include all essential elements and get the parties' signatures.' is true. Special contracts require careful attention to detail to ensure that all the essential elements are present, which typically include a clear description of the services or goods to be provided, the obligations of each party, the payment terms, and the signatures of all parties involved to indicate their consent and agreement to the terms.
In historical context, documents like treaties and constitutions are forms of contracts between parties. For example, Exercise 9.3.1 asks if the necessary and proper clause limits the national government's power, which is false. The clause actually provides flexibility to the U.S. Congress to make laws deemed necessary and proper for carrying out its powers.
Regarding the treatment of Loyalists post the signing of the treaty (likely referring to the Treaty of Paris 1783), the statement that 'Loyalists were protected by the treaty and well treated after it was signed' is false; many Loyalists faced ongoing hostility and dispossession.
John Locke's involvement in the Carolina constitution is a historical fact; however, stating that 'John Locke wrote the original constitution for Carolina, but it was not what the colony needed' is true. Locke's constitution, known as the Fundamental Constitutions of Carolina, included sophisticated principles that were not practical for the conditions.