Final answer:
The Supreme Court can interpret the Constitution using methods such as originalism or considering it a living document, and through judicial review established by Marbury v. Madison. The Court avoids conflicts with other branches and sets precedents affecting future legal interpretations.
Step-by-step explanation:
Supreme Court Decisions and Constitutional Interpretation
The Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has several methods for interpreting the Constitution when deciding cases. First, it can use the original constitution's text to determine the framers' intent (originalism). This method considers the historical context at the time the Constitution or a particular amendment was written. Alternatively, the Court may view the Constitution as a living document that should be interpreted based on contemporary standards and values (living constitutionalism).
Another aspect is the judicial review power, which is not explicitly stated in the Constitution but was established by Marbury v. Madison. This power enables the Supreme Court to declare acts of the other branches unconstitutional if they contravene the Constitution. The informal amendment process reflects ongoing interpretations and applications of constitutional principles.
The Supreme Court often seeks to avoid direct conflict with the Legislative and Executive branches, maintaining its position as the highest judicial body and ensuring constitutional balance. The decisions by the Court create a precedent, affecting future legal interpretations and contributing to the evolutionary process of constitutional law.