Main Answer:
For agentless monitoring (no OneAgent, no automatic injection), a viable alternative is to leverage lightweight instrumentation that can be manually integrated into the target system.
Step-by-step explanation:
In scenarios where agentless monitoring is essential, the absence of OneAgent and automatic injection necessitates a more hands-on approach. To address this, organizations can opt for a solution that involves lightweight instrumentation. This entails manually integrating monitoring components into the targeted system, ensuring minimal disruption and resource consumption. This approach allows for the extraction of relevant performance data without relying on automated agents or injection processes.
Agentless monitoring becomes crucial in environments where automatic injection is not feasible or poses operational challenges. By embracing lightweight instrumentation, organizations gain flexibility and control over the monitoring process. This method enables selective monitoring of specific components or applications without the need for an overarching agent. Additionally, the manual integration of instrumentation facilitates a tailored approach, allowing organizations to adapt their monitoring strategy to the unique requirements of their systems.
In conclusion, for agentless monitoring without OneAgent and automatic injection, the adoption of lightweight instrumentation offers a pragmatic solution. This method empowers organizations to maintain visibility into their systems while providing the autonomy to strategically implement monitoring components.