Question

If an individual's rights have been violated by an act that benefitted society as a whole (and the net result to society is positive), which method of ethical reasoning will find the act to be unethical?

a. Rights Approach
b. Utility Approach
c. neither
d. both

Answer 1

The act in question involves an individual's rights being violated, but the net result to society is positive. The Rights Approach would consider the act to be unethical, as it focuses on respecting and protecting individual rights.

Step-by-step explanation:

The act in question involves an individual's rights being violated, but the net result to society is positive. In this case, the method of ethical reasoning that will find the act to be unethical is the Rights Approach. The Rights Approach focuses on respecting and protecting individual rights, and views violating someone's rights as inherently unethical, regardless of the benefits it may bring to society as a whole.