Final answer:
In a criminal case, the state must prove its case "beyond a reasonable doubt," while in a civil case, the plaintiff must prove the case "beyond a preponderance of the evidence."
Step-by-step explanation:
In a criminal case, the state must prove its case "beyond a reasonable doubt." This means that there should be no doubt in the minds of the jury that the defendant committed the crime they are accused of. On the other hand, in a civil case, the plaintiff must prove the case "beyond a preponderance of the evidence." This means that the evidence presented must weigh more on the plaintiff's side in the eyes of the jury or judge. This standard of proof is lower than the standard in a criminal case.