Final answer:
It is true that the Nevada Supreme Court does not have to consider all cases filed, mirroring the discretion practiced by the U.S. Supreme Court in selecting cases for review. Both state and federal courts handle civil and criminal matters, with federal jurisdiction typically invoked for cases that involve a federal question.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the Nevada Supreme Court does not have to consider all cases filed is true. Not all cases brought before the Nevada Supreme Court are obligated to be heard. This is in line with the general judiciary system in the United States, where the Supreme Court, as a court of last appeal, has the discretion to choose which cases it will review.
For example, Section 2 Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution outlines that certain cases, such as those involving ambassadors or states as a party, may go directly to the Supreme Court. However, beyond these specific instances, the Supreme Court has significant freedom to decide on which cases to grant certiorari, or the review of a lower court's decision.
Regarding the types of cases that state and federal courts handle, it is noteworthy that both jurisdictions are authorized to hear matters that involve both civil and criminal law. In terms of jurisdiction, a state case is more likely to be heard by federal courts when it involves a federal question, rather than being based solely on state law or at the request of a governor. The federal judiciary, including both trial and appellate courts, handles relatively few cases compared to state courts, indicating the breadth of the state judiciary's role in the U.S. legal system.