Final answer:
Court decisions can become public policy through their influence on shaping policy. Judicial implementation refers to the process of putting court decisions into effect. Potential problems in implementing court decisions include resistance or lack of support from other branches of government, conflicts with existing laws or regulations, and challenges in enforcement at the state or local level.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the United States, court decisions can become public policy through their influence on shaping policy. While Congress and the president consider broad questions of public policy, the courts focus more closely on the specific context of individuals, groups, or issues affected by their decisions. The judiciary influences policy through its rulings and interpretations, and as cases are brought to the courts, court decisions can help shape policy.
Judicial implementation refers to the process of putting court decisions into effect. It involves the implementation and enforcement of court decisions by the other branches of government. However, there can be potential problems in implementing court decisions, such as resistance or lack of support from the executive or legislative branches, conflicts with existing laws or regulations, or challenges in enforcing the decisions at the state or local level.
For example, the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, faced significant challenges in implementation. Many states and localities resisted desegregation, leading to continued segregation and delays in enforcing the Supreme Court's decision.