Final answer:
The case question appears to mix details from different legal cases concerning privacy and search. For accurate case law regarding the expectation of privacy in one's office computer, specific circumstances and case precedents from the Supreme Court need to be considered.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the case of United States of America v. Angevine and whether the said professor had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his office computer.
Based on the information provided, there seems to be a mix-up with another case related to search and privacy issues regarding a student named Savanna. However, the case most related to the expectation of privacy in computer information is not the Angevine case but rather deals with the concept of whether the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures applies to electronic surveillance and digital information. In landmark cases such as New Jersey v. T.L.O. and United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, the courts balanced the need for security with the protection of individual privacy rights.
It is crucial to examine the specific circumstances of each case, as courts generally consider factors such as ownership of the device, policies in place regarding the use of the device, and the nature of the information sought.