Final answer:
The statement suggesting that reform options like abolishing plea bargaining and establishing sentencing guidelines aim to limit judicial jurisdiction is false. These reforms seek to structure the plea process, ensure consistent sentencing, and improve parole, thus enhancing the criminal justice system's efficacy and fairness.
Step-by-step explanation:
Reform options such as abolishing plea bargaining, establishing plea bargaining guidelines, developing sentencing guidelines, and abolishing parole are not designed to limit judicial jurisdiction but rather to provide structure to the plea bargaining process, ensure more consistent sentencing, and reform the system of early release. The statement in the question is false.
Plea bargaining is a common practice where defendants may plead guilty to lesser charges in exchange for more lenient sentencing. Sentencing guidelines help judges assign appropriate sentences based on the severity of the crime and other factors, and parole offers a supervised release to rehabilitated inmates prior to the end of their sentence. These reforms aim to improve the fairness and effectiveness of the criminal justice system, rather than limit the scope of judicial power.