Final answer:
It cannot be categorically stated whether some offenders will continue to kill if not executed; the Supreme Court has limited the death penalty's application and moral and legal considerations make this a complex issue with no clear-cut answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that some offenders will continue to kill if they are not executed and eventually released is too absolute and cannot be definitively categorized as true or false without context. In recent years, the Supreme Court has limited the application of the death penalty, ruling that it cannot be imposed on certain groups, for example, individuals with cognitive disabilities or those who were under the age of eighteen at the time of their crime. The laws governing the death penalty are subject to change and are often influenced by a variety of factors, including shifts in public opinion and ethical considerations. For instance, the reexamination of past cases through improved DNA evidence has revealed situations in which innocent people were wrongfully executed, influencing some states to abolish capital punishment entirely.
Furthermore, a guilty verdict followed by a death sentence does not necessarily guarantee future safety. Alternatives to the death penalty, such as life imprisonment without parole, aim to protect society from dangerous individuals by ensuring they are never released. The complexity of the issue also encompasses a range of moral, legal, and psychological concerns about whether capital punishment serves as a deterrent to murder or if it inadvertently punishes innocent individuals.