Final answer:
The Army Accident Causation Model defines individual, leader, and training failures as key contributing factors to various non-natural calamities, including flight and insubordination. These failures reflect weaknesses in command and can significantly affect the safety and effectiveness of the army.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Army Accident Causation Model defines individual, leader, and training failures as key factors that contribute to accidents within the army. The model suggests that these failures can lead to various calamities such as flight, insubordination, collapse, ruin, disorganization, and rout, which do not arise from natural causes but from the faults of those in command. This is emphasized by the idea that leaders are responsible for the mentioned faults, and their decisions significantly impact the effectiveness and safety of their troops.
For instance, the model observes that a hasty temper from a general can lead to provocations and altercations, cowards might lead to the capture of the troops, and over-solicitude or overconcern for the soldiers can potentially lead to worry and additional troubles. Likewise, when soldiers act outside of given instructions, as suggested by the example of a safety engineer looking at industrial accidents, it may indicate a failure in training or leadership that didn't enforce or clarify the necessity of the proper procedures, which is akin to the army's worries over insubordination or collapse.