Final answer:
By state law, the ability of a MA to answer questions about a consent form can vary. It is historically false that no state constitution in the Revolutionary Era allowed women to vote, as New Jersey's constitution did until 1807. The statement that Pennsylvania adopted the most conservative constitution during that period is also false.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks about Medical Assistants (MAs) and their legal limitations when discussing consent forms with patients. By state law, it varies whether a MA is allowed to answer questions regarding a consent form, as laws can differ from state to state, and the answer could be true or false depending on the jurisdiction. MAs are generally not allowed to provide legal advice, but they might be allowed to explain the medical procedures and implications which are covered in the consent form. The role of consenting to medical treatment is particularly nuanced when it comes to minors, for whom parents can provide consent on their behalf.
Regarding the historical content mentioned, it's false that no state constitution in the Revolutionary Era allowed women the right to vote. New Jersey's original 1776 constitution granted voting rights to all inhabitants with sufficient property, including unmarried women and black individuals, until 1807 when the law was changed to exclude them.
In the Revolutionary Era, Pennsylvania adopted a constitution that was considered one of the more radical rather than conservative, contrary to the provided statement that it was the most conservative, making that statement false.
Before the ratification of the 19th Amendment, women had limited rights, but the claim that they were not considered a legal person is false; women were legal persons, albeit with restricted rights compared to men.
Concerning colonial governance, it was true that colonial governors possessed the right to veto legislation passed by the colonial assemblies, which was part of the checks and balances within colonial governments.