Final answer:
The secrecy of the Court's deliberations is intentional to protect the integrity and independence of the judicial process. While Congress operates under rules of transparency, the judiciary maintains confidentiality, especially during private conferences where justices discuss cases. This confidentiality ensures impartial and thorough legal proceedings.
Step-by-step explanation:
Understanding the Secrecy of the Court's Deliberations
The question of whether it is proper that the Court's deliberations are secret with no minutes kept is primarily centered on the principles of judicial privacy and the integrity of the decision-making process. Courts often keep their deliberations confidential to ensure that justices can discuss cases freely and without outside pressure, allowing them to make decisions based solely on the law and the facts of the case. While Congress has certain transparency rules, as highlighted by the fact that neither the House nor the Senate may close down or move proceedings without the other chamber's consent, the judiciary has different standards to maintain its independence.
Examples from History and Law
During the ratification debates, the Antifederalists and Federalists held opposing views, with the Antifederalists being against the creation of a stronger federal government, which contradicts the statement in Exercise 9.3.3 and makes the correct answer 'b. False'.
The claim that no state constitution in the Revolutionary Era allowed women the right to vote is accurate, confirming 'a. True' in Exercise 9.1.4 and Exercise 4.
Dillon's Rule does not grant local governments extensive freedom; instead, it limits their powers to those expressly granted by the state legislature, which makes the correct statement 'B. False'.
The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was indeed called to revise the Articles of Confederation, validating 'a. True' in Exercise 9.3.1.
Secrecy in Judicial Deliberations
When justices conclude oral arguments, they discuss the cases in private conferences. These conferences are vital for maintaining the confidentiality and integrity of the judicial decision-making process. The closed nature of these conferences is considered appropriate to preserve the impartiality and thoroughness of legal proceedings before the official announcement of decisions is made.