204k views
0 votes
POSSIBLE POINTS: 6.67

Exotic animals are meant to live in their natural habitats. If they are not in their natural homes, then they should be in controlled settings such as
zoos. The average person is not equipped to care for them in a typical home. Experts estimate that approximately 20,000 exotic wild cats are living as
pets in the United States. Sadly, that is almost more than the number of tigers that exist in their natural environment. In states such as Texas, people
must have a license to own wild animals such as tigers, however, the state does not have regulations to guarantee the protection of those animals once
they have been bought.
Caring for exotic pets is extremely costly and can become dangerous. Annual food costs for one tiger cub can cost up to $6,000. These cubs can even
weigh up to 500 pounds in a just a few short months and become strong enough to overpower the average adult. These animals require plenty of space
to roam and feel comfortable. Luckily, when pet owners are worried about not doing a good job raising these animals, there are pet sanctuaries that are
willing to take the animals and care for them.

Monty is writing an argumentative text about not having exotic animals as pets. A classmate read an excerpt and suggested that Monty
needs to strengthen his credibility.
What are two changes Monty can make to strengthen the credibility of his paper?

Include facts about laws related to owning exotic animals.

Include direct quotes from animal experts about the cost and care of exotic pets.

Use stronger transitions between ideas.

Share a personal story about visiting a zoo.

Remove information about pet sanctuaries.

User Santosc
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Monty can improve the credibility of his argument by including facts about laws on exotic animal ownership and direct quotes from animal experts on the costs and care required for these pets. The correct answer is option 1. and 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

To strengthen the credibility of Monty's argumentative text on not having exotic animals as pets, two key changes can be suggested.

First, Monty can include facts about laws related to owning exotic animals. This would entail providing specific information on licensing, regulations, and the effectiveness of these legal measures in protecting both the animals and the public. Incorporating such facts can give more authority to his position and demonstrate a clear understanding of the legal landscape surrounding exotic pet ownership.

Secondly, Monty could include direct quotes from animal experts about the cost and care of exotic pets. This would involve reaching out to veterinarians, zoologists, or representatives from animal welfare organizations who could offer professional insights into the complexities of caring for such animals. By presenting expert opinions, Monty would be relying on authoritative voices to reinforce his argument and persuade readers of the seriousness of the issues at hand.

In making these changes, Monty will be able to back his arguments with concrete information and informed views, rather than relying solely on emotional appeal or subjective reasoning, thereby improving the persuasive power of his text.

User Heeran
by
7.7k points