Final answer:
The National Review and MSNBC show media bias through their selection of stories, framing of issues, and use of selective expert opinions.
The National Review has a conservative bias, while MSNBC leans liberal, each influencing their audience's perceptions on political matters and current events.
Step-by-step explanation:
Understanding Media Bias: National Review and MSNBC
The way the National Review and MSNBC show bias is multifaceted and can be understood through various aspects of their news coverage. These outlets tend to display bias through selection of stories, framing, and the selection of sources.
The National Review is known for its conservative perspective, while MSNBC is recognized for its liberal slant. For example, during the 2012 political campaigns, MSNBC's coverage of Mitt Romney contained significantly more negative stories when compared to the coverage of Obama by Fox News, which also showed a clear negative bias.
Furthermore, bias is evident in opinion pieces and how different narratives are shaped regarding critical issues like the COVID-19 pandemic. Viewers of Fox News, for example, were more likely to believe that COVID-19 was created in a lab, while MSNBC viewers had confidence that the virus was naturally occurring and that a vaccine would be effectively developed.
This shows how the choice of which experts to quote and which reports to highlight can sway public perception.
In general, media outlets demonstrate bias through story selection, framing of narratives, and the use of selective expert opinions that align with their editorial stances. The balance of opinions presented and where they are placed within the story are crucial to assessing the level of bias.
News organizations with a clear political allegiance might also highlight issues or stories that resonate with their audience's views while minimizing or ignoring opposing viewpoints.