Final answer:
The questions imply a focus on modern physics, raising issues that are difficult to reconcile due to the complexity of the subject, such as the wave-particle duality. Understanding scientific evidence and the role of physics in national emergencies and policymaking also play into these considerations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The questions you're asking seem to revolve around the topic of modern physics and its concepts, which can be challenging to grasp due to the complex nature of the subject matter. For instance, reconciling classical physics with quantum mechanics generates deep questions that require a solid understanding of both areas. The difficulty in satisfying both conditions you mentioned likely refers to certain principles in physics that initially appear contradictory or counterintuitive, such as the wave-particle duality of light and matter.
Understanding your audience is essential when writing a paper, academic or otherwise. For the audience to grasp the point of your paper, they need to have a foundational knowledge of the subject matter. In this case, knowledge of scientific evidence like fossils is essential for discussions about modern physics and its implications.
Moreover, national emergencies and war are topics that can also involve physics, especially in the development and implications of technologies and strategies. Motivations and needs for policymaking can also influence scientific endeavors and how science is communicated to the public.