191k views
0 votes
Which of the following statements about the takings clause is not accurate?

a. the government generally may take private property, so long as it pays just compensation.
b. private property may not be taken by the government for private use.
c. the takings clause applies only to real property, not personal property.
d. the supreme court has limited the takings clause only for a government purpose.

User Blyde
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The incorrect statement regarding the takings clause is that it applies only to real property, not personal property. In reality, the Takings Clause applies to both real and personal property and requires the government to provide just compensation for any private property taken for public use.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement about the takings clause that is not accurate is: c. the takings clause applies only to real property, not personal property. This statement is incorrect because the Takings Clause applies to both real and personal property.

The Takings Clause, part of the Fifth Amendment, provides that the government may take private property for public use, but must provide just compensation to the owner. This process is known as eminent domain. It is not restricted solely to real property like land or buildings; it also encompasses personal property.

It's important to understand that the government can take private property for public purposes, which is sometimes a necessary aspect of urban development and public projects like highways and schools. However, some cases, such as Kelo v. City of New London, have expanded the interpretation of public use to include economic development projects that primarily benefit private parties, as long as they are expected to provide broader economic benefits to the community.

User Shoukat Mirza
by
7.6k points