Final answer:
(B) Executive: Refuse to enforce the decision, Legislative: Confirm new judicial appointees to the court The executive branch can refuse to enforce judicial decisions, and the legislative branch can influence the judiciary through the confirmation of judicial appointees. Additionally, the legislative branch can rewrite laws and modify the court system as ways to challenge court decisions.
Step-by-step explanation:
The accurate comparison of how the government branches can challenge controversial court decisions is: Executive: Refuse to enforce the decision, Legislative: Confirm new judicial appointees to the court.The executive branch may choose not to enforce a court's decision, although typically, presidents view it as their duty to obey and enforce these rulings. The legislative branch can check the judiciary by rejecting or confirming judicial nominees, restructuring federal courts, rewriting laws that the courts have declared unconstitutional, or even starting the process of a constitutional amendment. The Senate specifically has the role of approving judicial appointments, providing a direct check on who becomes part of the judiciary.
The correct comparison of how the government branches can challenge controversial court decisions is:(A) Executive: Veto the court decision, Legislative: Override the decision by a two-thirds majority.The executive branch can use the power of veto to reject a court decision, while the legislative branch can override the decision with a two-thirds majority vote. This is an important check and balance system within the government, ensuring that decisions made by the courts can be challenged if necessary.