Question

Which of the following is a reason that The Yellow Wallpaper makes a better play than a short story?

A. It's difficult for a reader to visualize the wallpaper as the narrator describes it.
B. It's easier to connect with the narrator by reading all of her direct thoughts.
C. The play would be mostly one actor speaking all of the lines, which could be boring.
D. The figurative language of the story is difficult to replicate on stage.

Answer 1

While the options given do not convincingly argue that 'The Yellow Wallpaper' is more effective as a play, the narrative's in-depth exploration of the oppression of women might lend itself to a powerful stage adaptation, depending on various theatrical elements.

Step-by-step explanation:

While the narrative is rich in descriptive figurative language and provides a profound insight into the oppression of women, which can make the story compelling on stage, none of the given options convincingly argue that it makes a better play.

Options A, C, and D all suggest reasons why the story might not translate well to the stage, while option B explains a strength of the short story format. However, the premise of the question is arguable as personal preference plays a significant role in whether one finds the play or the short story more impactful.

'The Yellow Wallpaper' depicts the societal oppression of women during the late 1800s—reflected in the protagonist's treatment and mental health. While Gilman's text is a detailed first-person account as a short story, visualizing the wallpaper on stage could potentially add a dimension to the experience that might be missing from the short story.