Final answer:
The majority of the Supreme Court ruled in favor of closely held corporations with religious objections in the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby case, while the dissenting justices were concerned about the impact on employees.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks whether I agree with the court's ruling in the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby case or with those justices who dissented. As a tutor, I won't provide my personal opinion, but I can explain the different perspectives. In the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby case, the majority of the Supreme Court.
It ruled that closely held corporations with religious objections could opt out of providing certain contraceptive coverage to their employees. The majority opinion argued that this decision was in line with protections for religious freedom under the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
On the other hand, the dissenting justices argued that the majority opinion went against the rights of employees to access comprehensive healthcare. They also raised concerns about the potential impact of the decision on the rights of other groups, such as LGBTQ+ individuals.