Question

Based on the scenario, how does the supreme court decision in fletcher reflect judicial restraint?

A. the supreme court's decision in the case did not overturn a legislative action.
B. the supreme court was responding to the public outcry over bribes involved in the original sale.
C. the supreme court disagreed with the legislative actions of the state of georgia and remedied the response.
D. the supreme court's decision was rooted in their acknowledgement that the implementation of the law was not executed in the lower court and this decision was a remedy.

Answer 1

The Supreme Court decision in Fletcher reflects judicial restraint because it did not overturn legislative action, demonstrating deference to the legislature in line with judicial restraint principles.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Fletcher vs. Peck case reflects judicial restraint, where the Supreme Court decides with caution and deference to the legislative branch. The correct answer to how the decision reflects judicial restraint is A. the Supreme court's decision in the case did not overturn a legislative action.

This aligns with the principles of judicial restraint by showing deference to the legislature, avoiding judicial activism, and respecting stare decisis. The Supreme Court often seeks to avoid conflict with the Legislative and Executive branches, rarely overturning legislative actions without clear constitutional violations.