Final answer:
The document appears to be a primary source and does not explicitly state the author's opinion on the impact of the Mongols.
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Is this source primary or secondary? How do you know? This document appears to be a primary source. Primary sources are firsthand accounts or original documents from the time period being studied. It is evident in this case that the document is a primary source because it is an excerpt from a document titled, '1.5: Debates and Compromises that Impacted the Founding Documents,' which suggests that it provides direct information about the historical events.
2. Based on this document, did the author believe the world would be better or worse off without the Mongols? The document does not explicitly state the author’s opinion on whether the world would be better or worse off without the Mongols. The author appears to present the document with neutrality, providing a factual account rather than expressing personal beliefs or opinions.