Final answer:
Any government is generally better than no government, as the absence of governance often results in chaos and a struggle for power. Throughout history, various government forms have been adopted to meet societal needs, but complete anarchy is mostly seen as detrimental to a society's well-being.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering a scenario of complete anarchy where all authority and order have broken down, it's broadly agreed upon that some form of government is preferable. The notion of complete lawlessness paints a picture close to the 'state of nature' described by Thomas Hobbes, known for its inherent chaos and survival of the fittest. In such a state, life is difficult and unpredictable, lacking the securities and amenities we have grown accustomed to in organized societies.
History has shown us a variety of government forms, each tailored to the specific needs and beliefs of a society. While democracies are currently held in high regard in Western societies for their fairness and stability, others have thrived under different systems. Every form of government has its advantages and disadvantages, and what's most important is that the governing body aligns with the will of the people it represents.
Without some form of governance, there is often no way to control violence or arbitrate disputes which would be detrimental to any society. Anarchists hold the contrary belief that government is the root cause of disorder, and that societies are capable of self-governance based on mutual aid and collective responsibilities. However, the consensus is that without some kind of organized government, society tends to degenerate into a struggle for resources and power, ultimately harming the common good.