Final answer:
When a hypothesis is proven incorrect, Kui should develop a new hypothesis and continue with further experimentation. Ignoring results or abandoning the experiment wouldn't contribute to the scientific process.
Step-by-step explanation:
After Kui determines that the hypothesis was wrong, the best next step would be to develop a new hypothesis. In the scientific method, if experimental results are inconsistent with the original hypothesis, a scientist should discard the hypothesis and formulate an alternative. The process continues with further experimentation. Ignoring results, abandoning the experiment, or repeating the investigation without changes would not be productive steps if the hypothesis is already proven incorrect.
Per the scientific method, it's essential that a hypothesis be testable. If multiple experiments contradict the hypothesis, then it's necessary to revise or replace it with a new one that better explains the observations. Each experimental result brings closer to a comprehensive understanding of the natural world.