Final answer:
The differentiation between common law and governors' discretionary powers lies in the contrast between legal consistency and potentially capricious executive decisions. While governor vetoes might benefit residents by refining laws, they risk undermining legislative power.
Step-by-step explanation:
Potential Differences Between Common Law and the Whims of the Governor
The distinction between common law and the so-called "whims of the governor" rests on the foundation of systematic legal precedent versus the unpredictable and individualistic judgments of a single authority figure. Common law is developed through court decisions over time, creating a body of precedents that guide future rulings. This stands in contrast to decisions made based on the desires or whims of a governor, which may lack consistency and can be swayed by personal bias or political influences.
The Role of the Governor
Despite the formal powers associated with the office, governors face many challenges, including working with state legislatures, which may be controlled by an opposing party. This divided government can complicate the achievement of a governor's agenda. Historically, the role of governors was strictly administrative, with figures like Thomas Jefferson advocating for limitations on their executive power to prevent tyranny.
Regarding the powers sometimes referred to as the "Vanna White" and "Frankenstein" vetoes, there is debate about whether a governor should have the ability to alter legislation before signing it into law. On one hand, it could allow a governor to refine legislation to better serve state residents, but on the other hand, it could undermine the legislative intent and checks and balances system.
Advantages and Concerns with Governors Altering Bills
If governors could reshape bills before signing them, this might provide some state residents with a more tailored approach to lawmaking. However, allowing for such discretion could also lead to the concentration of power in the hands of one individual and may deviate from what was democratically passed by the legislature, raising questions about the balance of power and democratic representation.