Final answer:
Evidences under the Butuan Claim include artifacts like the Butuan Silver Paleograph, while the Limasawa Claim is supported by Antonio Pigafetta's writings.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Butuan Claim and the Limasawa Claim pertain to the historical debate about the first Catholic mass in the Philippines. The Butuan Claim posits that the first mass took place in Masao, Butuan, not on Limasawa Island. Evidence underpinning this claim includes ancient artifacts such as the Butuan Silver Paleograph and the location's history of pre-colonial trade.
Contrastingly, the Limasawa Claim, which is supported by the majority of Philippine historians, is based on the writings of Antonio Pigafetta, Magellan's chronicler. This evidence is complemented by the journals of other expedition members and linguistic studies of place names mentioned in historical accounts.
Additional evidence includes archaeological finds and oral traditions that are consistent with the events recorded by Pigafetta. A possible concession to the Butuan claim might be inconsistencies or alternative interpretations of historical texts, but no conclusive evidence has been presented to overturn the broadly accepted Limasawa narrative.