A. Exclusion → Lack of sufficient evidence
B. Positive identification → Complete match with no discrepancies
C. Insufficient evidence → A complete mismatch
D. Possible identification → Consistent match but doubtful evidence
In comparative dental identification, different conclusions convey distinct meanings regarding the alignment of dental records and evidence.
A. Exclusion (A) signifies that there is a lack of sufficient evidence to establish a match between the dental records and the evidence at hand. This suggests that the available information does not support a positive identification.
B. Positive identification (B) indicates a complete match with no discrepancies. This conclusion implies that the dental records and evidence align perfectly, providing unequivocal confirmation of the individual's identity.
C. Insufficient evidence (C) suggests a complete mismatch between the dental records and the evidence. In this scenario, the available information is inadequate to establish a connection or positive identification.
D. Possible identification (D) implies a consistent match, but there is doubt regarding the evidence. This conclusion suggests that while there is alignment between the dental records and the evidence, there may be uncertainties or limitations that introduce doubt into the identification process.