Final answer:
The nature of the relationship Dominion Motors had with Hamilton evolved from a partnership in exploring and exploiting the oil fields to a potential business dispute or competition when Hamilton decided to test and qualify a competitor.
Step-by-step explanation:
The nature of the relationship Dominion Motors had with Hamilton from the time the oil fields were discovered until Hamilton decided to conduct their own tests and qualify a competitor can be characterized as a business partnership. Dominion Motors, a prominent player in the oil industry, likely had a contractual alliance or agreement with Hamilton to explore and exploit the oil fields. However, when Hamilton chose to test and qualify a competitor, it indicates a shift in their relationship, potentially signaling a business dispute or competition.
The question incorrectly combines historical facts about Alexander Hamilton with a fictional business scenario involving Dominion Motors and Hamilton. Without context, it's impossible to address the business relationship, but the historical event of the duel with Aaron Burr is well-documented.
The question seems to be mixing historical events with a business scenario. The reference to Hamilton's interference leading to a duel actually pertains to the historical figure, Alexander Hamilton, who engaged in a duel with Aaron Burr on July 11, 1804, in Weehawken, New Jersey. However, there appears to be confusion in the question, as it combines this historical fact with the fictional context of a company named Dominion Motors having relationships with another entity named Hamilton, presumably in the context of oil fields and business tests. Without additional context, it's not possible to provide a factual response regarding the nature of the relationship between Dominion Motors and Hamilton. The historical duel is a matter of public record, while the business scenario seems to be hypothetical or specific to an unstated source material.