The price of evidence that best supports this claim. A. Viewing clothing on a variety of models can make it easier for customers to determine what will fit them. Therefore, A. Viewing clothing on a variety of models can make it easier for customers to determine what will fit them is correct .
The claim that clothing stores should represent more body types in their retail websites is convincingly supported by the evidence presented in option A, which states, "Viewing clothing on a variety of models can make it easier for customers to determine what will fit them."
This evidence is not only practical but also aligns with the fundamental purpose of retail websites—to provide customers with accurate information about products and assist them in making informed purchasing decisions.
When clothing is showcased on a diverse range of models, it addresses the inherent variability in body shapes and sizes among the customer base.
This inclusivity allows potential buyers to visualize how the clothing will look on individuals with different body types, enhancing their ability to assess the fit and style.
It promotes a more realistic and relatable shopping experience, contributing to increased customer satisfaction.
On the other hand, option B, which suggests that advertisers and clothing retailers often doctor photos to make models appear thinner than they are, may be a valid concern but does not directly support the claim.
While it highlights a potential issue with the representation of body types, it doesn't provide a positive solution for ensuring a more inclusive and accurate depiction of clothing on retail websites.
Option A, with its emphasis on practicality and customer convenience, serves as a stronger and more constructive piece of evidence supporting the claim.