Final answer:
The assertion that there was lighting without residue in the pyramids for artwork is false. Evidence indicates that ancient Egyptians used flame-based illumination, such as torches or oil lamps that left residues like soot.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that lighting in pyramids was a necessity to enable artwork to be done without any residue of fire required to create the light is false. Although lighting was indeed necessary for artwork within pyramids, there is no evidence to suggest that ancient Egyptians had access to a light source that did not produce residue like smoke or soot from a fire. In fact, traces of such residues have been found in some tombs and pyramids, indicating that fires, likely from torches or oil lamps, were used to provide illumination for the artists who decorated these interiors.
The Egyptian Dynasty's beliefs and impressive architectural feats, such as the massive tombs built for pharaohs, are a testament to their ingenuity. These elaborate structures were decorated with artwork and carved reliefs, often illuminated by early lighting methods.
As seen in diverse historical contexts, artificial lighting, like candlesticks and lamps, were essential in buildings with limited natural light, ensuring that essential activities or artwork could be carried out. Ancient Egyptian artists used available materials and techniques, such as mineral pigments and various binding mediums, to create their enduring works, which they then lit using the flame-based lighting of their era.