The whole rectangle has 4 equal parts and 1 is shaded. Shanti is not correct. One-fourth of the area of the whole rectangle is shaded.
The whole rectangle has 4 equal parts, and 1 part is shaded. Shanti is correct if the shaded area represents
of the entire rectangle's area. In this case, since there are four equal parts and only one is shaded, the ratio of the shaded area to the total area is
, not
as Shanti claimed.
Thus, Shanti is not correct. The shaded area is
of the total area, not
) as stated. For Shanti's statement to be accurate, one-third of the rectangle should be shaded, which would correspond to having three equal parts shaded out of a total of nine.
In summary, Shanti's statement is incorrect because the actual ratio of the shaded area to the total area is
, not
as she claimed.