37.5k views
2 votes
This rectangle is divided into equal parts. Shanti says the shaded part is of the

area of the whole rectangle. Is Shanti correct?
Use the drop-down menus to explain your answer.

This rectangle is divided into equal parts. Shanti says the shaded part is of the-example-1
User Rhyttr
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

6 votes

The whole rectangle has 4 equal parts and 1 is shaded. Shanti is not correct. One-fourth of the area of the whole rectangle is shaded.

The whole rectangle has 4 equal parts, and 1 part is shaded. Shanti is correct if the shaded area represents
\((1)/(3)\) of the entire rectangle's area. In this case, since there are four equal parts and only one is shaded, the ratio of the shaded area to the total area is
\((1)/(4)\), not
\((1)/(3)\) as Shanti claimed.

Thus, Shanti is not correct. The shaded area is
\((1)/(4)\) of the total area, not
\((1)/(3)\) as stated. For Shanti's statement to be accurate, one-third of the rectangle should be shaded, which would correspond to having three equal parts shaded out of a total of nine.

In summary, Shanti's statement is incorrect because the actual ratio of the shaded area to the total area is
\((1)/(4)\), not
\((1)/(3)\) as she claimed.

User Szpic
by
8.5k points