Final answer:
Ethical naturalism and virtue ethics are the most compatible with evolutionary ethics because they align with the idea that virtues, which enhance survival and social cooperation, are part of human nature and contribute to biological flourishing.
Step-by-step explanation:
The ethical theory most compatible with evolutionary ethics is likely ethical naturalism, which proposes that good actions fulfill human nature while bad actions distort it. This alignment is due to the fact that evolutionary ethics suggests our moral tendencies can be inherited and shaped by survival needs, which parallels the naturalistic idea that morality is connected to human flourishing.
Evolutionary ethics posits that virtues may be a product of habit, example, instruction, and reflection, influencing the development of a moral sense that improves our chances for survival. Over time, virtuous tendencies that enhance survival and social cooperation could become part of our nature. Hence, the virtues highlighted in virtue ethics, emphasizing character traits that foster community and well-being, also align well with evolutionary ethics. Moreover, these virtues are seen as critical for the development of meaningful relationships and the actualization of individual potential, both key aspects of biological flourishing.
Consequentialism and deontology may not align as closely with evolutionary ethics, as they focus more on the outcomes of actions or adherence to duties, rather than the evolutionary development of moral tendencies. However, consequentialist theories that emphasize the well-being of the species could still find some compatibility with evolutionary ethics which also considers the survival and prosperity of the group.