Final answer:
Courts consider the E. likelihood of the injury, the seriousness of the injury, and the ease of warning when determining a manufacturer's negligence in failing to provide adequate warnings. In the case of the automobile manufacturer, the known brake system defects would likely lead to a finding of negligence because of these factors.
Step-by-step explanation:
Courts often consider several factors in determining whether a manufacturer was negligent in failing to warn of a product's dangers. These factors include:
- The likelihood of the injury: This refers to the probability that the defect will cause harm.
- The seriousness of the injury: This pertains to the potential severity of the harm that could occur as a result of the defect.
- The ease of warning: This involves how simple it would be for the manufacturer to provide a warning to users about the potential risk.
In the scenario provided regarding the automobile manufacturer, the company would likely be found negligent due to their knowledge of the defective brake system and the potential harm it could cause, which includes both the likelihood and seriousness of injury, in addition to the ease with which they could have warned consumers.