Final answer:
Natural rights are fundamental rights that are inherent to all individuals and include the rights to life, liberty, and property. Negative rights require others to refrain from interfering with an individual's actions, while positive rights require others to provide certain goods or services. John Locke believed that government's purpose is to protect natural rights through a social contract, and I agree with his theory.
Step-by-step explanation:
Natural rights are fundamental rights that are believed to be inherent to all individuals and are not granted by any government or society. These rights are considered unalienable and include the rights to life, liberty, and property. They are often protected by governments through social contracts.
Negative Rights vs Positive Rights
Negative rights are rights that require others to refrain from interfering with an individual's actions, such as the right to free speech or freedom of religion. Positive rights, on the other hand, are rights that require others to provide certain goods or services, such as healthcare or education. While negative rights are focused on individual liberty, positive rights are focused on creating a more equal society.
John Locke's Theory of Natural Rights
According to John Locke, natural rights are rights that all individuals possess in a state of nature. These rights include life, liberty, and property. Locke believed that the purpose of government is to protect these natural rights and that individuals enter into a social contract with the government to secure these rights. He argued that if a government fails to protect these rights, individuals have the right to overthrow it.
Personally, I agree with Locke's theory of natural rights. I believe that individuals have certain fundamental rights that should be protected by the government. However, it is important to balance these rights with the needs of society and consider the impact of positive rights in creating a more equitable society.