Final answer:
The result of critical columns by a columnist like Steve Garland (presumably similar to Charles Blow) could be increased public awareness and debate. As seen in the impact of journalism, such as Talking Points Memo's reporting, critical columns can lead to real-world consequences like political scandals and resignations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the consequences of critical columns written by Steve Garland, who is presumably a columnist akin to Charles Blow who writes for The New York Times. It is important to note that the identity of Steve Garland is not specified in the information provided, and there might be a confusion with an existing writer. If we are discussing the effects of critical columns similar to those by established columnists like Charles Blow, one possible result could be a heightened public awareness or debate on the issue addressed in the column. Columns, particularly those in high-profile publications, can catalyze discussions and potentially lead to societal or political changes. Specifically, those by Charles Blow often address pressing social issues and can influence public opinion.
Taking an example from other known cases, like the work published on Talking Points Memo, investigative journalism can lead to real-world consequences, such as political scandals and the resignation of government officials as seen in the case with the firing of U.S. attorneys and subsequent resignation of Alberto Gonzales. Similarly, opinion pieces could potentially influence political discourse and bring attention to critical race theory or other academic frameworks in understanding social dynamics.