Final answer:
The histogram supports the statement that the median mercury concentration falls between 0.002 and 0.003 milligram/liter. It also supports the statement that a small proportion of rivers had a mercury concentration greater than 0.004 milligram/liter.
Step-by-step explanation:
The histogram shows the concentration of mercury in the sample of 25 area rivers. Let's analyze each statement:
- The median mercury concentration falls between 0.002 and 0.003 milligram/liter. This statement is supported by the histogram, as the middle value of the data falls between the given range.
- The range of mercury concentrations did not exceed 0.006 milligram/liter. This statement is supported by the histogram, as the maximum value shown is 0.005 milligram/liter, which is less than 0.006 milligram/liter.
- The range of mercury concentrations was exactly 0.006 milligram/liter. This statement is not supported by the histogram, as the maximum value shown is 0.005 milligram/liter, not exactly 0.006 milligram/liter.
- The mean mercury concentration falls between 0.001 and 0.002 milligram/liter. This statement is not supported by the histogram, as the mean value is not directly shown in the histogram.
- A small proportion of rivers had a mercury concentration greater than 0.004 milligram/liter. This statement is supported by the histogram, as there are bars representing rivers with mercury concentrations above 0.004 milligram/liter.