Final answer:
The analogy indicates that language evolves continuously, is shaped by cultural and social contexts, and this evolution affects our perception of reality as per the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis.
Step-by-step explanation:
The analogy from the article 'Do You Speak American - The Truth About Change' suggests that language change is an ongoing and natural aspect of linguistic experience.
This process is seen as inseparable from cultural context and social dynamics. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis posits that language doesn't just mirror reality but shapes our perception of it – different languages foster different cognitive frameworks within their speakers.
This reflects the idea that language change is inevitable (B), driven by the natural evolution of culture, and potentially leads to unique ways of thinking and perceiving the world. Contrary to suggestion (A), language is not a static entity but rather fluid and adaptable.
Social context (contrary to C) has a profound impact on language, influencing not only vocabulary and grammar but also the meanings and connotations of words. Lastly, change in language is generally not considered to be reversible (D) in the way physical changes might be – once language evolves, it's difficult to revert back to prior states.