Final answer:
The Constitution of the United States has strengths and weaknesses, and whether it is near perfect is subjective. Its system of checks and balances, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights are seen as strengths, while its flaws include the omission of certain rights and the amendment process.
Step-by-step explanation:
Benjamin Franklin described the Constitution of the United States as 'near perfect' despite its flaws. Whether one agrees or disagrees with this statement depends on individual perspective. Some may argue that the Constitution's system of checks and balances, separation of powers, and protection of individual rights make it near perfect. However, others may disagree, pointing out flaws such as the original omission of certain rights and the processes required for amending the Constitution.
One can argue that the Constitution of the United States has been continuously adapted and amended to address the changing needs and values of the American society. For example, the Bill of Rights, which includes the first ten amendments to the Constitution, was added to protect individual liberties. Additionally, the amendment process allows for the Constitution to be updated and changed as needed. In conclusion, whether one agrees or disagrees with Benjamin Franklin's statement depends on personal opinion and how one views the strengths and weaknesses of the Constitution of the United States.