Final answer:
The Headright system is like encomienda because both involve land grants and labor distribution. The House of Burgesses is like a town meeting because both are forms of local self-government. Joint-stock companies are like royal colonies because both involve governance and economic organization.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Headright system in colonial Virginia is similar to the encomienda system in Spanish colonies. Both systems were a form of labor distribution and land ownership. In the Headright system, parcels of land were granted to settlers who could pay their own way to Virginia. Similarly, in the encomienda system, Spanish settlers were given land and the right to use indigenous labor.
The House of Burgesses in colonial Virginia is similar to a town meeting in New England colonies. Both were forms of local self-government. The House of Burgesses was the first elected representative assembly in the New World and allowed colonists to voice their concerns and work for the common good. Similarly, a town meeting was a democratic gathering in which eligible voters in a town could meet to discuss and make decisions on local matters.
Joint-stock companies in colonial America are similar to royal colonies. Both were forms of colonial governance and economic organization. Joint-stock companies, like the Virginia Company, allowed investors to pool their resources and share in the profits and risks of colonization.