Question

In which subject does federal efforts to correct discriminatory state laws often take the form of legislation?

a) Law
b) Social Studies
c) Government
d) History

Answer 1

The subject in which federal efforts often take shape as legislation to correct discriminatory state laws is Government. Key legislation like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 has been instrumental in enforcing equal protection, with federal laws prevailing over state laws in areas like immigration.

Step-by-step explanation:

Federal efforts to correct discriminatory state laws often take the form of legislation within the subject of Government. This includes significant legislative actions such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which was pivotal in addressing discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, and sex. These federal laws are a crucial part of ensuring equal protection under the law and are enforced by various federal agencies, including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which investigates discrimination in employment. Furthermore, when there is a conflict between state and federal law, as in the case of immigration policies, federal laws trump state laws. This demonstrates the federal government's role in maintaining a national standard for civil rights and preventing discriminatory practices.

Answer 2

Federal efforts to remedy discriminatory state laws typically involve government legislation, like the Civil Rights Act of 1964, with agencies like the EEOC enforcing these laws.

Step-by-step explanation:

Federal efforts to correct discriminatory state laws often take the form of legislation in the subject of Government. An example of such legislation is the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which aimed to address discrimination in various areas including employment, public accommodations, and education. The enforcement of these laws is sometimes a task for specific federal agencies, such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which investigates discrimination and enforces the provisions of civil rights bills. Even when faced with state opposition, federal immigration laws override state laws, demonstrating the supremacy of federal legislation in areas where the two may conflict.